Bo Bøgvald

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bo Bøgvald shared this idea  · 
  2. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bo Bøgvald supported this idea  · 
  3. 47 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you again for your input.

    We are currently closely investigating this is part of a larger change for the repository view.

    Basically, we have two options: Making sorting only on view level, or on data level. Both has advantages and disadvantages. If we only do it on view level, the changes through sorting won’t be persistent, if we do it on data level, they will be persistent. In the first case, a new element would automatically appear in the “correct” location, in the latter case it would appear at the bottom and in order to get the list sorted again, you would have to sort the list again. If it is only on view level, you can’t manually rearrange elements anymore, they would be sorted and that’s it.

    What behavior would you as a user expect or prefer?

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    Bo Bøgvald commented  · 

    Data level, pls. We still need to manually be able to rearrange the repository, even after a sort..

    Bo Bøgvald supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We are constantly searching for ways to improve our Jira integration, especially since it’s so new. We will keep that in mind, and since our old (unofficial) Jira integration was able to handle custom fields, this would be a logical next step for this feature.

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    Bo Bøgvald supported this idea  · 
  5. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bo Bøgvald supported this idea  · 
  6. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bo Bøgvald supported this idea  · 
  7. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bo Bøgvald supported this idea  · 
  8. 32 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We have talked about this in the past before. The problem with multiple data sources for one test case is actually the way the iterations work and how the iterations over the test case should be handled. This could potentially get very confusing.

    However, we will evaluate if there is a solution that will both make sense and won’t be too confusing with the way iterations work with data connectors.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    Bo Bøgvald supported this idea  · 
  9. 31 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bo Bøgvald supported this idea  · 
  10. 128 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are currently investigating the issue again. One thing that will not be possible is to only use “references” to a test case (like it works with modules), but the requirement for unique test case (and Smart Folder) names could be changed. We are considering this for Ranorex 9.3, we can’t make any promises yet, though.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    Bo Bøgvald supported this idea  · 
  11. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bo Bøgvald commented  · 

    Besides being a really needed functionality, this functionality would allow for use of Ranorex in much wider context, and give Ranorex a much broader visibility. All this could turn into increased revenues for Ranorex. So, I think there should be a very appealing business cases for this one.

    Bo Bøgvald supported this idea  · 
  12. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Bo Bøgvald commented  · 

    I really think this should be an obvious and mandatory part of being able to run Ranorex via command line, and wonder why this possibility was not part of the original implementation of test sequences. Are command line execution normally prioritized below Studio execution?

    Also, for easy of use, please include this possibility in the Jenkins plugin as well. Thanks.

    Bo Bøgvald supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base