W. Triebkorn

My feedback

  1. 61 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Currently we are investigating all possible use cases for this idea.
    It would help us a lot if you could comment your project setup and how you are adding Ranorex to it. Thx a lot.

    Best regards
    Ranorex Product Management

    W. Triebkorn commented  · 

    We are using Azure DevOps build agents to build our SW (one agent per machine). Currently we have to install Ranorex on every of these machines. These agent were used by different teams and they use different versions of Ranorex. This leads to conflicts on the build agent.

    Expected: The Ranorex assemblies for building shall be included as nuget package. Every build can use a different version of Ranorex assemblies.

    W. Triebkorn supported this idea  · 
  2. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    W. Triebkorn supported this idea  · 
  3. 28 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    Currently, we are trying to change out our old code-gen tool for a new one. This would enable Ranorex to always support the newest C# versions. However, our code-gen is so deeply rooted into Ranorex Studio that this is more of a long-term project for us. We are working on it, but we won’t be there yet within the next few months.

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    W. Triebkorn supported this idea  · 
  4. 38 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We are currently investigating a few improvements for the conditions feature.

    We still think that conditions should almost never be used in black box testing, but we see them as a tool that can and should be used in a few exceptions. Therefore we don’t want to build upon what we currently have to make it a full feature. However, we will consider a few Quality of Life improvements.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    W. Triebkorn commented  · 

    Some addition to my explanation:
    "We would like to have the possibilty to mark and/or hide these "blocked" test cases in the Report of the Test Run."

    TestCases which were not executed by Condition shall get a new state "suppressed-by-condition" instead of "blocked".

    W. Triebkorn commented  · 

    Hello,

    some explanation about our use case of the Conditions.

    The user of our App can have different roles, e.g. "Viewer", "Service", "Admin". Test cases defined in Ranorex shall be executed under every possible role. The list of the roles is defined in a Datasource (Simpletable).
    But some test cases are only valid for specific roles. Therefore we use the Condition.

    Example:
    + TestCase1
    + works for all roles
    + all entries of Datasource are used

    + TestCase2
    + works only for roles Admin and Service
    + for role Viewer some UI elements are not visible
    + the entry Viewer of Datasource is filtered out by Condition

    + TestCase3
    + works only for role Viewer
    + the entry Admin and Service of Datasource are filtered out by Condition

    We would like to have the possibilty to mark and/or hide these "blocked" test cases in the Report of the Test Run.

    Or do you purpose a different approach for such test scenario?

    Best regards
    W. Triebkorn

    W. Triebkorn supported this idea  · 
  5. 50 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you again for your input.

    We have investigated this, and also created a working prototype. However, it required some weird hacks in the background, and also the usability (special syntax) felt weird. We decided to not ship this feature for now until we can come up with a solution that feels better.

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    W. Triebkorn supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base