KevSer

My feedback

  1. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We have put it into our backlog. Currently, this feature doesn’t seem to have a very high priority for us, though. We won’t forget about it, but as long as we don’t have more feedback from people that would need this feature we won’t implement this.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  2. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  3. 70 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Currently we are investigating all possible use cases for this idea.
    It would help us a lot if you could comment your project setup and how you are adding Ranorex to it. Thx a lot.

    Best regards
    Ranorex Product Management

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    KevSer commented  · 

    As a use case, I would say that we need to publish libraries relying on Ranorex methods and then, in a second time, use it in a Ranorex Solution.

    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  4. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  5. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    KevSer shared this idea  · 
  6. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We have currently already done a small proof-of-concept for this (for validation actions). However, it adds some additional complexity (because we need another Setting to toggle if the string should be just a string or if it should be evaluated for special characters that are used for the concatenation syntax).
    We have decided against shipping this feature, yet, because we don’t think that it feels right just of yet. However, we still have it on our backlog, and we will continue to try to find a good solution for this.

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  7. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  8. 55 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you again for your input.

    We have investigated this, and also created a working prototype. However, it required some weird hacks in the background, and also the usability (special syntax) felt weird. We decided to not ship this feature for now until we can come up with a solution that feels better.

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  9. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  10. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  11. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  12. 43 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  13. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  14. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    KevSer commented  · 

    Ranorex Magic Merger is not compatible out-of-the-box with Perforce. You have to pass the arguments through a wrapper (a cmd file or a small tool) to make it work.

    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  15. 70 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  16. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  17. 130 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    What are the exact features that you would want to have? What should this plugin’s functionality be?

    The minimun requirement would probably be an easy-to-use repository in some way, but what would you need in addition to that?

    We would appreciate some feedback on this.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  18. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    However, be aware that it’s not as easy as saying “If Ranorex works on Linux, I can also test my Linux applications”. Porting Ranorex Studio to Linux would itself already be a huge feat, but technology support for the different UI technologies would also have to be implemented. So which UI technology to support? Java (Swing, AWT, SWT, FX, …) might seem logical, because it’s platform-independent. However, it doesn’t work like this, because we would still have to develop a new, Linux-based plugin also for Java support.

    Ranorex Studio is tied to Windows very tightly. Maybe we get more freedom at some point with .NET Core, but this is – at best – a long term goal.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  19. 152 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you all for bringing this to our attention. This topic is currently the number one topic in our User Voice. We are aware that our API documentation is far from perfect, and we see the value in improving it ourselves.

    We are currently investigating the options we have for this API documentation. We are not sure yet about details like the format or the platform. Additionally, there are some parts of the API are not meant for public use and only enable Ranorex Studio to do specific things, etc.

    This means, we are aware of the issue and we are trying to figure out how to tackle this best.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    KevSer supported this idea  · 
  20. 80 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’re happy to announce an early release of a license statistic tool. Please feel free to download the application and to provide us with feedback (pm@ranorex.com).

    Download: https://download.ranorex.com/s/Yqb8b7DHDMc4Xbo
    Readme: https://download.ranorex.com/s/HCtgeDnbpad4jxa

    Note: The download package has been replaced by a new one as there were some files missing in the old package (2018-03-01 3:30 PM, CET.)

    Ranorex Product Management Team

    KevSer supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base