Marc

My feedback

  1. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  3. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  4. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  4 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  5. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  6. 125 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    What are the exact features that you would want to have? What should this plugin’s functionality be?

    The minimun requirement would probably be an easy-to-use repository in some way, but what would you need in addition to that?

    We would appreciate some feedback on this.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    Marc supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Marc commented  · 

    I totally agree with Julian as writing codemodules inside SharpDevelop using C# >6 features is a real pain. Most important features for us are:
    * Repository editor
    * Testsuite editor
    * Remote test execution

    Recordings are not relevant for us, because we entirely use code modules and have no recordings (it is way faster and more flexible).

    All other features are nice-to-haves and IMHO should be postponed to a later release.

  7. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    You are correct, this functionality would be handy in some cases and it doesn’t seem logical why it shouldn’t work.

    However, this is an edge case that probably not many users face. We might consider it in our data management update if it proves to be an easy fix.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    Marc shared this idea  · 
  8. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  9. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  11. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  12. 32 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  13. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  14. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  15. 41 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc supported this idea  · 
  16. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    For Ranorex 9.2 we have an update for the Data Binding workflow and UI planned. The DataConnectors dialog is not part of this update, however, please tell us (after the release of course) if this new UI does make a difference for you and if it solves some of your problems already, or if we should still consider this suggestion.

    If you are interested in getting a first glimpse into this early, please consider joining the Ranorex Beta program. The 9.2 beta will be released around the start of September.

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    Marc supported this idea  · 
  17. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc shared this idea  · 
  18. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Marc shared this idea  · 
  19. 50 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you again for your input.

    We are currently closely investigating this is part of a larger change for the repository view.

    Basically, we have two options: Making sorting only on view level, or on data level. Both has advantages and disadvantages. If we only do it on view level, the changes through sorting won’t be persistent, if we do it on data level, they will be persistent. In the first case, a new element would automatically appear in the “correct” location, in the latter case it would appear at the bottom and in order to get the list sorted again, you would have to sort the list again. If it is only on view level, you can’t manually rearrange elements anymore, they would be sorted and that’s it.

    What behavior would you as a user expect or prefer?

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    Marc supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base