Miguel

My feedback

  1. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    I have put this to our backlog.
    Since this would require us to constantly send information over the network, this could be more effort than we would see it benefit our customers.
    Since we have several upvotes here on the UserVoice for it, I will get a work estimation from development to see if it would fit into a future release.

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Miguel commented  · 

    I think this is totally needed. Totally agree.

    Miguel supported this idea  · 
  2. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Miguel commented  · 

    Agree with this, we need to add modular module groups in bigger ones

    Miguel supported this idea  · 
  3. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Miguel supported this idea  · 
  4. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We have talked about this in the past before. The problem with multiple data sources for one test case is actually the way the iterations work and how the iterations over the test case should be handled. This could potentially get very confusing.

    However, we will evaluate if there is a solution that will both make sense and won’t be too confusing with the way iterations work with data connectors.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    Miguel supported this idea  · 
  5. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Miguel commented  · 

    Agree with that, totally necessary

    Miguel supported this idea  · 
  6. 41 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Miguel supported this idea  · 
  7. 50 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    Due to technical limitations it is not possible at all to continue a finished test run from a specified point, because there is no runtime information available anymore after you see a finished report.

    However, it might be possible to do something like this in maintenance mode. As soon as we touch maintenance mode again, we will evaluate if this feature also makes sense in there.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    Miguel supported this idea  · 
  8. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We are currently looking into this. We see the need for this, since it is only a small usability issue it will probably not have a high priority for us. I can just promise that we won’t forget about it.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    Miguel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Miguel commented  · 

    Also will be fine if we can edit from the test suite view as well

  9. 50 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you again for your input.

    We are currently closely investigating this is part of a larger change for the repository view.

    Basically, we have two options: Making sorting only on view level, or on data level. Both has advantages and disadvantages. If we only do it on view level, the changes through sorting won’t be persistent, if we do it on data level, they will be persistent. In the first case, a new element would automatically appear in the “correct” location, in the latter case it would appear at the bottom and in order to get the list sorted again, you would have to sort the list again. If it is only on view level, you can’t manually rearrange elements anymore, they would be sorted and that’s it.

    What behavior would you as a user expect or prefer?

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Miguel commented  · 

    Totally necessary, it is a mess to work with big repositories without sorting, even if you can search items

    Miguel supported this idea  · 
  10. 79 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’re happy to announce an early release of a license statistic tool. Please feel free to download the application and to provide us with feedback (pm@ranorex.com).

    Download: https://download.ranorex.com/s/Yqb8b7DHDMc4Xbo
    Readme: https://download.ranorex.com/s/HCtgeDnbpad4jxa

    Note: The download package has been replaced by a new one as there were some files missing in the old package (2018-03-01 3:30 PM, CET.)

    Ranorex Product Management Team

    Miguel supported this idea  · 
  11. 133 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you all for your input.

    Starting with Ranorex 9.3, you are now allowed to use non-unique names for test cases and SmartFolders. This isn’t as good as really having full reusability of test cases (I know), but it should help you in some instances. For example, having the “same” SmartFolder in several places now is easier, you don’t have to rename them after copy/pasting them.

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    Miguel supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base