loonquawl

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for the input.

    With Ranorex 9.2, we will release an overhauled data management experience, and your issues should be handled with the changes we have planned for this.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    loonquawl shared this idea  · 
  2. 121 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are currently investigating the issue again. One thing that will not be possible is to only use “references” to a test case (like it works with modules), but the requirement for unique test case (and Smart Folder) names could be changed. We are considering this for Ranorex 9.3, we can’t make any promises yet, though.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    loonquawl commented  · 

    better yet, make it objkect oriented at that level, so same name is same entity, and you don't have to alter 99 copies of the same part of a test (that part of the test may not be simply packable to a recordings-group, as there may be data-sources, IF-dependencies et al)

    loonquawl commented  · 

    Better yet: make them object oriented, so same-name entities will actually be same

    loonquawl commented  · 

    Would be very convenient to just use an instance of a Testcase, instead of the Testcase itself.

    Would make everything much more easy to alter and service - especially if the user gets some say on the instance (have an instance of the testcase somewhere, in studio show that TC as it is, with checkboxes pre-enabled for every recording and module, so you can disable individual modules in that instance of the TC)

    It would be like a cool module group, because module groups have that instantiation-goodness, but lack loopability and the possibilty of SmartFolders (which would provide conditionality) - the dis-/enabling of individual modules would just be another convenient twist on the general idea.

    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl shared this idea  · 
  6. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  7. 27 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl commented  · 

    btw. just noticed that a file containing the headers "Var [1]" etc. will not even get read, because Ranorex balks at the space in the header name...

    loonquawl commented  · 

    Auto-bind and Auto-create work well for cases with just one variable of the same name in the current context.
    Yet if there are two variables (e.g. "Var") of the same name in one context, Ranorex offers them as "Var [1]" and "Var [2]" - that would work out, if
    a) in the case of Variable Binding it was possible to have those names as headers of data columns (it isn't, the names get altered to "Var__1_", or
    b) in the case of Parameters it was possible to Auto-bind the module variables to Parameters of that name (a Parameter "Var [1]" does not get auto-bound to a varaible of the same name. Auto-Create will omit the " [1]" and only create one element called "Var"

    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  8. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  9. 49 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We have started working on a data-binding UI overhaul. The sum of changes that we plan will probably come in the next two versions of Ranorex (so not everything will already be in 9.2), and we hope to create a much better user experience when working with external data sources.

    If you are interested in having “early access” to these new changes, please register for our Beta Program. There you can give us valuable feedback for further improvements in this feature: https://www.ranorex.com/beta-program/

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Studio Product Management Team

    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  10. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  11. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl shared this idea  · 
  12. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We are currently investigating a few improvements for the conditions feature.

    We still think that conditions should almost never be used in black box testing, but we see them as a tool that can and should be used in a few exceptions. Therefore we don’t want to build upon what we currently have to make it a full feature. However, we will consider a few Quality of Life improvements.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  13. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl commented  · 

    I'm not sure about the mechanism, but some sort of semi-automated Repository groomin would be great.
    -> Have Ranorex trawl for altered images, in the background, so i just use the app, Ranorex assembles Screenshot to every found Repo-Item, and then you can revise those and mark the ones you'd like to update, all in one fell swoop.
    -> Have Ranorex background- trawl the App to find dead-end Xpaths (user can decide whether thats to be expexted, or can alter state of AUT and re-trawl)

    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  14. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  15. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  16. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We know that our documentation is far from perfect. A better API documentation is the highest-voted feature here in the user voice.

    On the other hand, we have released our new user guide several months ago. The new guide is far more detailed than the old one, and we have started to provide more material than ever before.

    A possible next step could be an offline version (export) of the user guide. Would this be interesting for you, or are there more pressing topics in our documentation?

    We would appreciate some input.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Studio Product Management Team

    loonquawl shared this idea  · 
  17. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We already have the feature to add all matching children of an element to the repository. This is probably the nearest we can come to your request.

    Something that will not be possible at all is to have multi-select in the Spy, because elements are too vastly different to be able to provide a multi-select option that makes sense.

    Is there something more that you actually need?

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  18. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  19. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  20. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base