loonquawl

My feedback

  1. 133 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you all for your input.

    Starting with Ranorex 9.3, you are now allowed to use non-unique names for test cases and SmartFolders. This isn’t as good as really having full reusability of test cases (I know), but it should help you in some instances. For example, having the “same” SmartFolder in several places now is easier, you don’t have to rename them after copy/pasting them.

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    loonquawl commented  · 

    better yet, make it objkect oriented at that level, so same name is same entity, and you don't have to alter 99 copies of the same part of a test (that part of the test may not be simply packable to a recordings-group, as there may be data-sources, IF-dependencies et al)

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    loonquawl commented  · 

    Better yet: make them object oriented, so same-name entities will actually be same

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    loonquawl commented  · 

    Would be very convenient to just use an instance of a Testcase, instead of the Testcase itself.

    Would make everything much more easy to alter and service - especially if the user gets some say on the instance (have an instance of the testcase somewhere, in studio show that TC as it is, with checkboxes pre-enabled for every recording and module, so you can disable individual modules in that instance of the TC)

    It would be like a cool module group, because module groups have that instantiation-goodness, but lack loopability and the possibilty of SmartFolders (which would provide conditionality) - the dis-/enabling of individual modules would just be another convenient twist on the general idea.

    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  3. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl shared this idea  · 
  5. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  6. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  7. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  8. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl shared this idea  · 
  9. 40 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We are currently investigating a few improvements for the conditions feature.

    We still think that conditions should almost never be used in black box testing, but we see them as a tool that can and should be used in a few exceptions. Therefore we don’t want to build upon what we currently have to make it a full feature. However, we will consider a few Quality of Life improvements.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  10. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    loonquawl commented  · 

    I'm not sure about the mechanism, but some sort of semi-automated Repository groomin would be great.
    -> Have Ranorex trawl for altered images, in the background, so i just use the app, Ranorex assembles Screenshot to every found Repo-Item, and then you can revise those and mark the ones you'd like to update, all in one fell swoop.
    -> Have Ranorex background- trawl the App to find dead-end Xpaths (user can decide whether thats to be expexted, or can alter state of AUT and re-trawl)

    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  11. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  12. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  13. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We know that our documentation is far from perfect. A better API documentation is the highest-voted feature here in the user voice.

    On the other hand, we have released our new user guide several months ago. The new guide is far more detailed than the old one, and we have started to provide more material than ever before.

    A possible next step could be an offline version (export) of the user guide. Would this be interesting for you, or are there more pressing topics in our documentation?

    We would appreciate some input.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Studio Product Management Team

    loonquawl shared this idea  · 
  14. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We already have the feature to add all matching children of an element to the repository. This is probably the nearest we can come to your request.

    Something that will not be possible at all is to have multi-select in the Spy, because elements are too vastly different to be able to provide a multi-select option that makes sense.

    Is there something more that you actually need?

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  15. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  16. 27 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  17. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  18. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  19. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
  20. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We have this topic on our backlog for quite some time already, but since we have never received a lot of interest in this, it will likely stay there forever. We see why this would be a cool feature, but there are enough tools out there that do this better than we could.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    loonquawl supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base