Alexander Rutscheidt

My feedback

  1. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alexander Rutscheidt shared this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alexander Rutscheidt supported this idea  · 
  3. 152 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you all for bringing this to our attention. This topic is currently the number one topic in our User Voice. We are aware that our API documentation is far from perfect, and we see the value in improving it ourselves.

    We are currently investigating the options we have for this API documentation. We are not sure yet about details like the format or the platform. Additionally, there are some parts of the API are not meant for public use and only enable Ranorex Studio to do specific things, etc.

    This means, we are aware of the issue and we are trying to figure out how to tackle this best.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    Alexander Rutscheidt supported this idea  · 
  4. 69 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alexander Rutscheidt supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Alexander Rutscheidt commented  · 

    But keep in mind, if a person goes home and leaves Ranorex open he may run an overnight test.
    In this case a forced license disconnect would perhaps destroy the test.

  5. 133 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you all for your input.

    Starting with Ranorex 9.3, you are now allowed to use non-unique names for test cases and SmartFolders. This isn’t as good as really having full reusability of test cases (I know), but it should help you in some instances. For example, having the “same” SmartFolder in several places now is easier, you don’t have to rename them after copy/pasting them.

    Best Regards,
    Thomas from the Ranorex Product Management Team

    Alexander Rutscheidt supported this idea  · 
  6. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alexander Rutscheidt shared this idea  · 
  7. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alexander Rutscheidt supported this idea  · 
  8. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    However, be aware that it’s not as easy as saying “If Ranorex works on Linux, I can also test my Linux applications”. Porting Ranorex Studio to Linux would itself already be a huge feat, but technology support for the different UI technologies would also have to be implemented. So which UI technology to support? Java (Swing, AWT, SWT, FX, …) might seem logical, because it’s platform-independent. However, it doesn’t work like this, because we would still have to develop a new, Linux-based plugin also for Java support.

    Ranorex Studio is tied to Windows very tightly. Maybe we get more freedom at some point with .NET Core, but this is – at best – a long term goal.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    Alexander Rutscheidt supported this idea  · 
  9. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alexander Rutscheidt supported this idea  · 
  10. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alexander Rutscheidt supported this idea  · 
  11. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alexander Rutscheidt supported this idea  · 
  12. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alexander Rutscheidt supported this idea  · 
  13. 24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alexander Rutscheidt supported this idea  · 
  14. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your input.

    We have talked about this in the past before. The problem with multiple data sources for one test case is actually the way the iterations work and how the iterations over the test case should be handled. This could potentially get very confusing.

    However, we will evaluate if there is a solution that will both make sense and won’t be too confusing with the way iterations work with data connectors.

    Best Regards,
    The Ranorex Product Management Team

    Alexander Rutscheidt supported this idea  · 
  15. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Ideas to Improve Ranorex  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Alexander Rutscheidt commented  · 

    Hello,
    it would be nice to edit/change shortcuts. In the editor you can have a table (sortable) which can be used for an overview.

    The shortcut for comments is CTRL-OemQuestion. I had to google the US-Layout and found it at an unusuable place (DE-Layout: #-Key)

    I would like to change some key to fit my habits of other IDEs.

    Thanks in advance.

    Kind regards
    A.R.

Feedback and Knowledge Base